Green Rust

Do Green and Rust Mix At All?

Slates Mickey Kaus points us to an article in the National Journal by Ron Brownstein. It asks one question about my home town (and “rust belt” cities in general), and about the hopes that these town have to rebuild and revitalize on waves of “Green Manufacturing”.   The question is: What are they smoking?

For officials at every level, the great hope is that these fading car towns can move from rust to green, from building autos to manufacturing wind turbines and solar panels or buses and subway cars. These places offer many advantages for such production: factories, supply chains, transportation links, and a skilled workforce “that knows how to do metal,” as Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio says.

Well, those seem like pretty good reasons. Brownstein continues:

But there are few examples of such conversions succeeding in the auto plants already closed, notes Dan Luria, research director for the Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center, a government-business partnership. And although Obama’s policies ensure that the U.S. will buy more alternative energy and transit equipment in the years ahead, Luria says, there’s no guarantee that those products will be built in America, much less in these particular communities, unless Washington encourages it through an integrated set of carrots and sticks beyond anything under discussion. Brown, likewise, is urging a national manufacturing policy.

Well, given their advantages, why wouldn’t autos be built in Detroit, and subway cars in Wayne, and wind turbines and solar panels in Buffalo? Kaus throws a clue brick.

Hmm. Why might manufacturers of “alternative energy and transit equipment” want to avoid locating their factories in the heavily-unionized rustbelt? Do you think the ongoing example of Detroit’s Big Three might have a cautionary effect on their decision-making?

The research director, Laria, quoted by Brownstein above, encourages the Obama administration to use “an integrated set of carrots and sticks” to overcome this – um… hesitation.  In English, Kaus notes that it’s also called a “national manufacturing policy”.  Yeah, that’s the ticket.  Make them stay in Detroit if they want to build “alternative energy and transit equipment”.  They use policy like that all the time.  In communist China and Cuba.

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: domestic, Economics, politics

2 Comments on “Green Rust”

  1. WWRTC Says:

    Howdy from the SC Low Country….like your site. I really don’t think the current admin cares too deeply about mfg, except for the large Unionized ones that provide easy re-election $$$. Our leaders have not had much concern about mfg for some time even though mfg is the best ladder for many into the Middleclass.

  2. joe Says:

    I tend to agree with you, WWRT. I can’t think of the last time we really had a “policy” about manufacturing at the federal level.

    That may not be a completely bad thing. Perhaps the argument can be made that this is better left to the states.

    The problem is, of course, that the states have bungled it for generations. Want evidence? I point you to N.Y., Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan and California.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: